How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution

How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution Reading How Progressives Rewrote The Constitution Author Richard A Epstein Easyfaroairporttransfers How Progressives Rewrote The Constitution Explores The Fundamental Shift In Political And Economic Thought Of The Progressive Era And How The Supreme Court Was Used To Transform The Constitution Into One That Reflected The Ideas Of Their Own Time, While Undermining America S Founding Principles Epstein Examines Key Decisions To Demonstrate How Progressives Attacked Much Of The Legal Precedent And Eventually Weakened The Court S Thinking Concerning Limited Federal Powers And The Protection Of Individual Rights Progressives On The Court Undermined Basic Economic Principles Of Freedom And Competition, Paving The Way For The Modern Redistributive And Regulatory State As Epstein Writes, The Progressives, Were Determined That Their Vision Of The Managed Economy Should Take Precedent In All Areas Of Life Although They Purported To Have Great Sophistication On Economic And Social Matters, Their Understanding Was Primitive The Progressives And Their Modern Defenders Have To Live With The Stark Truth That The Noblest Innovations Of The Progressive Era Were Its Greatest Failures How Progressives Rewrote The Constitution Shows That Our Modern Constitutional Law, Fashioned Largely By The New Deal Court In The Late S, Has Its Roots In Progressivism, Not In Our Country S Founding Principles, And How So Many Of Those Ideas, However Discredited By Recent Economic Thought, Still Shape The Court S Decisions

  • 3.2
  • 389
  • English
  • 09 May 2017
  • Paperback
  • 156 pages
  • 9781933995069
  • How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution
  • Richard A. Epstein

10 thoughts on “How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution

  1. Ann McReynolds says:

    This elegant little volume is the result of a lecture given to the Cato Institute in 2004 by Richard Epstein, of which this is an extended version.Professor Epstein s lecture was on the Progressive movement on which I had long been critical on constitutional, economic and philosophical grounds This little gem offers his defense of the earlier opinions on many controversial topics, in which the Old Court supported economic liberties and held a ...

  2. Frank Stein says:

    A succinct and well done explanation of the shift in constitutional thought from the 1910s to the 1930s Although presented as a brief of sorts for the old view of the Constitution, Epstein does not engage in screeds or purist laissez faire doctrine In fact, Epstein is at pains to point out how much regulation could be done under the old view of the constitution He showcases the very broad, mercantilist views behind the clause on interstate and foreign commerce, and celebrates Chief Justice John Marshall s very expansive reading of that clause From Gibbons v Ogden allowing a federal law on shipping licensing to overcome a local monopoly by Fulton to Brown v Maryland disallowing a state tax on importers , Marshall realized that the Constitution intended the powers of the federal government over commerce to be broad and comprehensive, and Epstein realizes that in practice this could lead to either laissez faire or regulated ends, but he appreciates the distinctions Marshall makes Epstein even condemns such narrow readings of the commerce power as the E.C Knight case 1895 , which prevented federal antitrust laws from reaching a sugar manufacturing monopoly Still, Epstein condemns...

  3. Sean Rosenthal says:

    Interesting Quote If there is one jurisprudential lesson that should be learned from Kelo v City of New London , it is that the Progressive tradition continues to operate in its bankrupt fashion to the present day The crushing defeat in Kelo is a disaster for the ordinary people who now stand to be thrown unceremoniously out of their homes But, than any academic writing could, it may expose the dangerous side of the big government position that is the hallmark of Prog...

  4. Rick says:

    I started this book some time ago, but never finished it Turns out you just about need to have a legal mind i.e legal training to understand it At least it seemed that way to me There is a lot of discussion of obscure to the layman legal cases and precedents I just r...

  5. Joel says:

    Well written summary of how progressive philosophy was implemented through Supreme Court decisions to dramatically alter the Constitution Decisions have dramatically altered the interpretation of individual...

  6. Eric Bauer says:

    A fairly good short read that talks about the constitution and the deliberate reinterpretation of it by the progressives and how activist judges on the Supreme Court have contributed to the erosion of liberties that were provided in the constitution to all Americans.

  7. Craig Bolton says:

    How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution by Richard A Epstein 2007

  8. Purple Wimple says:

    a short, and highly legalistic exploration of the Constitutional Revolution of 37, about which we do not learn in government schools.

  9. Curtis says:

    I m still not totally convinced.

10 comments / Add your comment below

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *